Some People are put off this Book because of the many Latin references or what appear to the superficial eye obscure historical figures only known in specialist academic circles which is a shame as this is a very easy to read investigation mystery with profound overtures to how we got where we are now as a Society , and how we may begin to work our way out of current problems.
Initially , the publisher want Eco to change the first one hundred or so pages of the Book as it would save the reader trawling through so many historical and religious references , Eco insisted in keeping them as they are because he wanted to test the fortitude of the reader , arguing a serious reader , which he was targeting , would get past this stage and be able to continue reading with due appreciation and respect for the substance of the work.
Not only does it contain many historical and philosophical references , it also has , like classic Greek literature , debate segments.
The "debates" issues are very stimulating and are well deserving of a full and frank exchange of views.
Im looking forward to discussing one of the later debates in the book as
i think Umberto makes it out as a clash between science and the "truth"
which , in my view , is not where the establishment went awry , as in
the matter of truth there is no mutually exclusive clash between
religion and science.
The clash was rather between Dogma and Science , which meant that there
was either going to be the prevalence of the Establishment or of
Science , which forced the issue that Science in Western Europe was
forced into the Atheist orbit in order to pursue its Truth whilst the
Establishment was moved deeper to Dogma.
This is where a Tragic breach was made in that has to be resolved so
that both Science and religion are co-participants on the course of
Truth and not two poles of the fruitless polemic of bloody semantics.
This is where i believe the West can learn from Judaism and Islam in
that those religions fully embraced science as a co-participant in the
journey of truth to such an extent that the great Jewish and Islamic
scientists mentioned in the Book where also esteemed religious Scholars
without there being any incompatibility whatsoever.
The various debates , especially comedy , to me , Bill Hicks; Richard
Pryor and Billy Connelly are most certainly philosophers that challenge
and force debates for betterment of positions with polemics being
dissipated and a stand up to long term scrutiny ethos to win out.
Another debate , hence the date of setting in the Book , is a moving away from the Church being a series of orders of believers giving of themselves and material possessions for the greater good to the centralising of the Church is the field of land ownership and aligning to Power interests. That debate seems to emanate from the clash of Papal authority in Avignon
and Rome and the emergence of the Germanic Holy Roman Empire.The debate
is how much , if at all , the Church should align to Power Politics and
BlocK cohesion or to sit it out of that Theatre and be a non-aligned
force of social movements.Religion is being used and abused by the Power Blocks (Avignon/Italy
Based/Germanic Holy Roman empire) with the adherents paying the blood
price.That is why it is important to draw a distinction from the Church and
the higher elites which were very much quasi-secular power block
commission appointments.
The Borghias were made infamous because they were outsiders and tried to
upset the Apple cart by trying to establish a Catalan order.This meant
that they did not give out the necessary grace and favours of land and
positions to the local Papal forces in Italy and they were pretty much
wiped out in just about a year after the first Pope died and normal
service was restored.
One Power blocks orthodoxy is another blocks heresy. If the Church is to get involved it has the choice of aligning itself
with the elite |Power Blocks , which as you state can be messy and
inconsistent (especially the Choices made in the 30s and 40s) or to have
a consistent moral line to lobby for a minimum standard of rights for
the lower elites and to give the Power Blocks no legitimacy that does
not tally with those minimum standards , this later choice at least
gives a long term consistent line that ultimately means the Church is
truly independent rather than tainted and have the worst of both worlds
of not being respected by the Power Blocks and not trusted by the weak.
In a way it relates well to the role of the Catholic Church in
Eurocentric powers ( alliances in the 30s and 40s) and after Pope John
Paul II support for the Victims of persecution in the former Soviet
Block ( and making the right noises about Inter-Faith dialogue) to
change under the current Pontiff to favour Rightist forces and the Role
of the Church in South America which is in the forefront of the social
justice movements that are looking to have more self-determination from
the overt Corporate interests from outwith the Continent.
It is perfectly easy to read the Book without dealing too intensely with the debates and history , and on that level is a quality entertaining Murder Suspense Mystery in its own right.
Below the Author discusses current Europeanzone issues with Jeremy Paxton.